←back to thread

65 points qvr | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.218s | source
Show context
miffe ◴[] No.44652742[source]
What makes this different from regular md? I'm not familiar with unRAID.
replies(2): >>44652869 #>>44653098 #
eddythompson80 ◴[] No.44652869[source]
unRAID is geared towards homelab style deployments. Its main advantages over typical RAID is it's flexibility (https://www.snapraid.it/compare):

- It lets you throw JBODs (of ANY size) and you can create a "RAID" over them.

- The biggest drive must be a parity drive(s).

- N parity = surviving N drive failures.

- You can expand your storage pool 1 drive at a time. You need to recalculate parity for the full array.

The actual data is spread across drives. If a drive fails, you rebuild it from the parity. This is another implementation (using MergerFS + SnapRAID) https://perfectmediaserver.com/02-tech-stack/snapraid/

It's a very simple model to think of compared to something like ZFS. You can add/remove capacity AND protection as you go.

Its perf is significantly less than ZFS of course.

replies(6): >>44653100 #>>44653205 #>>44653256 #>>44654189 #>>44654558 #>>44655212 #
1. somat ◴[] No.44653100[source]
Those are the features I liked about ceph, with the benefit that it uses the network to scale.