←back to thread

261 points anigbrowl | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.21s | source
Show context
jleyank ◴[] No.44611189[source]
It's really depressing how the US system seems to have existed "on belief". Once somebody set out to damage or destroy it, away it went. Pretty much without a whimper.

As I recall, the system was set up with 3 branches of government in tension. Obviously, that was naive.

replies(20): >>44611243 #>>44611251 #>>44611274 #>>44611292 #>>44611294 #>>44611300 #>>44611372 #>>44611468 #>>44612747 #>>44612970 #>>44613048 #>>44613100 #>>44613128 #>>44613243 #>>44613469 #>>44613869 #>>44615093 #>>44616024 #>>44616939 #>>44617655 #
asperous ◴[] No.44613048[source]
The framers noted that the system was vulnerable to a single "faction" [1]. The solution was to have many competing factions. I think first-past-the-post, corporate election influence, and mass media consolidated power into a single faction that ended up causing the system to break down (in that the branches don't seem to be checking each other's power right now).

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federalist_No._10

replies(6): >>44613331 #>>44613351 #>>44613478 #>>44613773 #>>44614498 #>>44615357 #
freddie_mercury ◴[] No.44613773[source]
I don't think corporate election influence or mass media really have anything to do with it.

The issue first showed up in 1828 election, when some of the Framers were still alive, and the US basically did nothing about it over the ensuing 200 years.

Remember it was Andrew Jackson who went around ignoring Supreme Court decisions and saying "they made their decision, let's see them enforce it".

And his abuse of executive powers during the Bank Wars to punish political enemies led to the formation of a new political party.

replies(4): >>44614254 #>>44618100 #>>44624912 #>>44627374 #
amy214 ◴[] No.44627374[source]
>I don't think corporate election influence or mass media really have anything to do with it.

Is any particular group overrepresented there? Hairy, long hooked nose? I'm talking about white cishetero men of course, this is all their fault. We need to have more, and by more, I mean ALL, such people to be non-cishetero non-white non-men.

replies(1): >>44632223 #
1. throwawayqqq11 ◴[] No.44632223[source]
You just invert identity politics to your liking and call it a solution without touching problem descriptions, root causes and potential true solutions.

Identity politics is at the core of the right, its a huge part of the problem. And you yield it just upside down...