←back to thread

321 points distantprovince | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
phito ◴[] No.44617442[source]
I really wish some of my coworkers would stop using LLMs to write me emails or even Teams messages. It does feel extremely rude, to the point I don't even want to read them anymore.
replies(10): >>44617497 #>>44617500 #>>44617658 #>>44617721 #>>44617880 #>>44617940 #>>44618006 #>>44618504 #>>44619441 #>>44622817 #
benatkin ◴[] No.44617500[source]
https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...
replies(1): >>44617529 #
echelon ◴[] No.44617529[source]
Wow. What a good giveaway.

I wonder what others there are.

I occasionally use bullet points, emdashes (unicode, single, and double hyphens) and words like "delve". I hate it think these are the new heuristics.

I think AI is a useful tool (especially image and video models), but I've already had folks (on HN [1]!) call out my fully artisanal comments as LLM-generated. It's almost as annoying as getting low-effort LLM splurge from others.

Edit: As it turns out, cow-orkers isn't actually an LLMism. It's both a joke and a dictation software mistake. Oops.

[1] most recently https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44482876

replies(5): >>44617586 #>>44617610 #>>44617712 #>>44617768 #>>44617817 #
Buttons840 ◴[] No.44617586[source]
Use two dashes instead of an actual em dash. ChatGPT, at least, cannot do the same--it just can't.
replies(5): >>44617630 #>>44617635 #>>44617694 #>>44617750 #>>44620853 #
Jtsummers ◴[] No.44617694[source]
It can't use two dashes? Is that like how Data couldn't use contractions (except he did)?
replies(1): >>44621880 #
Buttons840 ◴[] No.44621880[source]
I've asked it before, "please rewrite that but replace the em dashes with double hyphens", and then it says "sure, here you go", and continues to use em dashes.
replies(1): >>44622719 #
Ancapistani ◴[] No.44622719[source]
Were you using the web interface? If so, that’s likely why. It renders output dynamically on the frontend.

I bet if you did the same through the API, you’d get the results you want.

replies(1): >>44628716 #
1. Buttons840 ◴[] No.44628716[source]
Yes, I was using the web interface.