←back to thread

600 points antirez | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
bgwalter ◴[] No.44625261[source]
Translation: His company will launch "AI" products in order to get funding or better compete with Valkey.

I find it very sad that people who have been really productive without "AI" now go out of their way to find small anecdotal evidence for "AI".

replies(2): >>44625432 #>>44625574 #
brokencode ◴[] No.44625432[source]
I find it even more sad when people come out of the woodwork on every LLM post to tell us that our positive experiences using LLMs are imagined and we just haven’t realized how bad they are yet.
replies(4): >>44625504 #>>44625551 #>>44625771 #>>44625799 #
cratermoon ◴[] No.44625771[source]
We don't just tell you they were imagined, we can provide receipts.

https://metr.org/blog/2025-07-10-early-2025-ai-experienced-o...

replies(3): >>44625900 #>>44627683 #>>44629513 #
nojito ◴[] No.44625900[source]
Cursor is an old way of using LLMs.

Not to mention in the study less than 1/2 have ever used it before the study.

replies(1): >>44625959 #
roywiggins ◴[] No.44625959[source]
The AI tooling churn is so fast that by the time a study comes out people will be able to say "well they were using an older tool" no matter what tool that the study used.
replies(4): >>44625995 #>>44626051 #>>44630751 #>>44630786 #
nojito ◴[] No.44626051[source]
Not really. Chatting with a llm was cutting edge for 3 years it’s only within the last 8-10 months with Claude code and Gemini cli do we have the next big change in how we interact with llms
replies(2): >>44626110 #>>44627479 #
camdenreslink ◴[] No.44627479{3}[source]
How is Claude Code and Gemini CLI any different from using Cursor in agent mode? It's basically the same exact thing.
replies(1): >>44627667 #
1. steveklabnik ◴[] No.44627667{4}[source]
I can't speak to how they're technically different, but in practice, Cursor was basically useless for me, and Claude Code works well. Even with Cursor using Claude's models.