←back to thread

600 points antirez | 7 comments | | HN request time: 0.574s | source | bottom
1. apwell23 ◴[] No.44625088[source]
> Coding activities should be performed mostly with: Claude Opus 4

I've been going down to sonnet for coding over opus. maybe i am just writing dumb code

replies(5): >>44625351 #>>44625513 #>>44626015 #>>44627636 #>>44630717 #
2. stpedgwdgfhgdd ◴[] No.44625351[source]
That is also what Anthropic recommends. In edge cases use Opus.

Opus is also way more expensive. (Don’t forget to switch back to Sonnet in all terminals)

3. jtonl ◴[] No.44625513[source]
Most of the time Sonnet 4 just works but need to refine context as much as you can.
4. northern-lights ◴[] No.44626015[source]
In my experience as well, Sonnet 4 is much better than Opus. Opus is great at the start of a project, where you would need to plan things, structure the project, figure out how to execute but it cannot beat Sonnet is actually executing it. It is also a lot cheaper.
5. cyral ◴[] No.44627636[source]
Opus is too expensive and I find it goes way off the rails often (just writing way way too much. Maybe that could be controlled with a better prompt on my end). Sonnet gives me more realistic code that isn't too overengineered.
6. leemoore ◴[] No.44630717[source]
Same, if you dont give opus big enough problems it's more likely to go off the rails. Not much more likely but a little more likely
replies(1): >>44634648 #
7. jfkfibkririfk ◴[] No.44634648[source]
Did your meditation pay off? Did you hit stream entry?