←back to thread

Nobody knows how to build with AI yet

(worksonmymachine.substack.com)
526 points Stwerner | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.207s | source
Show context
karel-3d ◴[] No.44616917[source]
Reading articles like this feels like being in a different reality.

I don't work like this, I don't want to work like this and maybe most importantly I don't want to work with somebody who works like this.

Also I am scared that any library that I am using through the myriad of dependencies is written like this.

On the other hand... if I look at this as some alternate universe where I don't need to directly or indirectly touch any of this... I am happy that it works for these people? I guess? Just keep it away from me

replies(20): >>44617013 #>>44617014 #>>44617030 #>>44617053 #>>44617173 #>>44617207 #>>44617235 #>>44617244 #>>44617297 #>>44617336 #>>44617355 #>>44617366 #>>44617387 #>>44617482 #>>44617686 #>>44617879 #>>44617958 #>>44617997 #>>44618547 #>>44618568 #
lordnacho ◴[] No.44617013[source]
But you also can't not swim with the tide. If you drove a horse-buggy 100 years ago, it was probably worth your while to keep your eye on whether motor-cars went anywhere.

I was super skeptical about a year ago. Copilot was making nice predictions, that was it. This agent stuff is truly impressive.

replies(7): >>44617059 #>>44617096 #>>44617165 #>>44617303 #>>44617421 #>>44617514 #>>44618157 #
mnky9800n ◴[] No.44617096[source]
I think the agent stuff is impressive because we are giving the AI scaffold and tools and things to do. And that is why it is impressive because it has some directive. But it is obvious if you don't give it good directives it doesn't know what to do. So for me, I think a lot of jobs will be making agents do things, but a lot won't. i think its really strange that people are all so against all this stuff. it's cool new computer tools, does nobody actually like computers anymore?
replies(4): >>44617132 #>>44617159 #>>44617335 #>>44622092 #
prinny_ ◴[] No.44617159[source]
A lot of people join this profession because they like building stuff. They enjoy thinking about a problem and coming up with a solution and then implementing and testing it. Prompting is not the same thing and it doesn't scratch the same itch and at the end of the day it's important to enjoy your job, not only be efficient at it.

I have heard the take that "writing code is not what makes you an engineer, solving problems and providing value is what makes you an engineer" and while that's cool and all and super important for advancing in your career and delivering results, I very much also like writing code. So there's that.

replies(6): >>44617289 #>>44617310 #>>44617354 #>>44617386 #>>44617536 #>>44618236 #
1. theferret ◴[] No.44617310[source]
That's an interesting take - that you like the act of writing code. I think a lot of builders across a variety of areas feel this way. I like writing code too.

I've been experimenting with a toolchain in which I speak to text to agents, navigate the files with vim and autocomplete, and have Grok think through some math for me. It's pretty fun. I wonder if that will change to tuning agents to write code that go through that process in a semi-supervised manner will be fun? I don't know, but I'm open to the idea that as we progress I will find toolchains that bring me into flow as I build.