←back to thread

198 points todsacerdoti | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.21s | source
Show context
idlip ◴[] No.44573461[source]
Its nice read. We need more of comparative posts by user familiar with both nix and guix.

We see bias with most discussions.

Only cons with Guix I see is, lack of infrastructure and less volunteers to work on guix eco-system. If its solved, I can imagine guix can improve exponentially.

replies(4): >>44607020 #>>44607098 #>>44608492 #>>44609855 #
tempfile ◴[] No.44607098[source]
The major con is in the article, it is super slow to update. Half an hour is just crazy, nobody will move to that if they know.
replies(7): >>44607183 #>>44607656 #>>44607956 #>>44608088 #>>44608768 #>>44613046 #>>44614065 #
1. rolandog ◴[] No.44614065[source]
I think that also one needs to be familiar with modifying the guix daemon service to allow substitutes be downloaded so that you don't have to build derivations [0], [1].

Once you modify the guix daemon service and approve the substitute server keys with `guix archive`, your experience should be much faster.

[0]: https://guix.gnu.org/manual/en/html_node/Substitute-Server-A...

[1]: https://guix.gnu.org/manual/en/html_node/Getting-Substitutes...