←back to thread

258 points anigbrowl | 2 comments | | HN request time: 1.245s | source
Show context
dfee ◴[] No.44612986[source]
There’s strong consensus in these comments. That gives me pause.

Was the prior system good? Was it great? If so, was it optimal? If not, what does better look like?

The discussion can splinter a thousand ways, and on HN it should as we seek truth.

replies(4): >>44613024 #>>44613141 #>>44613583 #>>44614030 #
1. TrackerFF ◴[] No.44613583[source]
Time to pull out Occam's razor again:

A) The Trump admin has conducted rigorous analysis and audit of 55 years of EPA research, and concluded that it is so insignificant and ineffective that one can just dismantle the entire department.

B) The Trump admin rubber stamps anything the Heritage Foundation / Project 2025 wants done, and are desperate to find money for their tax cut funding.

replies(1): >>44613922 #
2. slaw ◴[] No.44613922[source]
Both.