(www.nytimes.com)

258 points anigbrowl | 1 comments | 18 Jul 25 23:00 UTC | HN request time: 0.211s | source

Show context

dfee ◴[19 Jul 25 06:09 UTC] No.44612986[source]▶

There’s strong consensus in these comments. That gives me pause.

Was the prior system good? Was it great? If so, was it optimal? If not, what does better look like?

The discussion can splinter a thousand ways, and on HN it should as we seek truth.

1. rezmason ◴[19 Jul 25 06:16 UTC] No.44613024[source]▶

Should we destroy the thing we're questioning before we have that conversation, or after it?

EPA says it will eliminate its scientific research arm