> I’m serious, read Knox’s review, and tell me if it doesn’t make you want to read Logue
Yeah it makes me want to read him like a clickbait title and thumbnail make me click on a youtube video. It works, but it's not healthy.
I've never read Christopher Logue, but the examples shown here and in a quoted article show that it's not a translation, so I don't see the point to use it in an article about translation and translator. For the work itself, I don't see the interest and the point in 2025, but maybe it was different in the period's zeitgest