←back to thread

468 points bookofjoe | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source

I would very much like to enjoy HN the way I did years ago, as a place where I'd discover things that I never otherwise would have come across.

The increasing AI/LLM domination of the site has made it much less appealing to me.

Show context
Lerc ◴[] No.44571964[source]
I have seen this question asked on subreddits, Not about AI, but for other topics that some people dislike.

They always seem to take the form of "Should we divide this group into A and B, A stays here and B goes over there and that way everybody is happy"

Invariably the person who proposes this wants to remain in group A and will not be a participant in group B.

To me this seems like the subtext is "Those people are not welcome here, they are not like us. It's not like we have anything against them, we just don't want them ramming it down our throats"

Anyone is free to make a website with whatever content they want, they can invite people to it and grow your own community. Directing a community to divide to remove an element you dislike is an attempt to appropriate the established community.

replies(13): >>44572047 #>>44572063 #>>44572187 #>>44572732 #>>44573487 #>>44573798 #>>44574179 #>>44574675 #>>44574900 #>>44575167 #>>44576690 #>>44576871 #>>44577033 #
ffsm8 ◴[] No.44572732[source]
To begin with, this would be a non issue if HN just introduced something like user provided tags and users can vote for/against (to circumvent abuse)

Then the people wanting to filter "x" could just do it via simple grease monkey scripts or if HN natively supported it.

Sure, it wouldn't be perfect, but neither does it have to be.

replies(3): >>44573909 #>>44576460 #>>44581073 #
Kiro ◴[] No.44576460[source]
No. HN is good as it is and I find it disrespectful when newcomers are demanding changes like this. There's a good reason the forum has stayed the same for almost 20 years.
replies(4): >>44576853 #>>44577694 #>>44577845 #>>44578577 #
bookofjoe ◴[] No.44577845[source]
1. I joined in 2016. I guess it all depends on what the cutoff is for "newcomers." I suppose you could call anyone who signed on after 2007 a newcomer.

2. "demanding?" I wrote:

>Is it time to fork HN into AI/LLM and "Everything else/other?"I would very much like to enjoy HN the way I did years ago, as a place where I'd discover things that I never otherwise would have come across. The increasing AI/LLM domination of the site has made it much less appealing to me.

replies(1): >>44578303 #
1. NaOH ◴[] No.44578303{3}[source]
>The increasing AI/LLM domination of the site has made it much less appealing to me.

Since you say this, I'm curious why you've also submitted about a dozen AI/LLM or adjacent articles in just the last two weeks. One was even a few hours before posting this Ask HN. That makes me think I'm not understanding something about your thinking.

replies(1): >>44580852 #
2. bookofjoe ◴[] No.44580852[source]
You make sense. In my ideal world there would be HNxAI and HN. I'd submit to both, and also regularly frequent each.