←back to thread

The new literalism plaguing today’s movies

(www.newyorker.com)
231 points frogulis | 1 comments | 15 Jul 25 03:52 UTC | HN request time: 0.23s | source
Show context
Lerc ◴[15 Jul 25 21:20 UTC] No.44575933[source]▶
The Wachowski's once commented that the Red Pill movement was a message to them telling them to never be subtle again.

Another data point. Most people seem to think that replicants are detected because they are unemotional.

I would prefer filmmakers not assume the least of their audiences, but I would also rather that audiences not give them reason to.

replies(1): >>44576140 #
smt88 ◴[15 Jul 25 21:45 UTC] No.44576140[source]▶
The creator of The Boys has also said he needs to beat people over the head so he doesn't have a similar situation to Mad Men or Breaking Bad, where people think the main character is a hero to emulate
replies(2): >>44576358 #>>44576562 #
1. Lerc ◴[15 Jul 25 22:08 UTC] No.44576358[source]▶
Yeah, I guess The same problem exists with The Watchmen and Fight Club.

I found it fascinating how the term snowflake was changed because the character that people admired told their proxies that they were not snowflakes. The meaning at the time was that they were homogenous and unremarkable. Snowflakes represented the opposite where each individual snowflake has a unique pattern. That viewpoint was not empowering so they took the metaphor to be about the fragility of snowflakes.