←back to thread

Random selection is necessary to create stable meritocratic institutions

(assemblingamerica.substack.com)
360 points namlem | 1 comments | 14 Jul 25 15:28 UTC | HN request time: 0.21s | source
Show context
fiforpg ◴[14 Jul 25 21:54 UTC] No.44565768[source]▶
While the idea — of shuffling a societal system a little bit to prevent it from going stale — sounds important, I'm not convinced. Random shuffling leads to good results only when it is combined with a good fitness estimate (see: natural selection). And establishing a fitness test for a societal order seems to be a much harder issue than than that of an organized randomization.
replies(2): >>44565785 #>>44575680 #
1. Faint ◴[15 Jul 25 20:51 UTC] No.44575680[source]▶
Speaking of random shuffling, I think it should be made much easier to conduct RCTs on citizens to try out systems of governance/social programs/etc. to see what works best. Basically test stuff instead of guessing and voting. I think citizens are equal enough if they have equal chance to get to the treatment group.