←back to thread

231 points frogulis | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.505s | source
Show context
s28l ◴[] No.44571704[source]
I find this article rather underwhelming because it spends so much time calling out bad examples and so little time highlighting examples of subtlety (in any era). Without positive examples, I don’t think they make the case that this is a new phenomenon or even a phenomenon at all: all the author has done is identify a lens to criticize through.

It may be the case that this is a recent phenomenon (though some other commentators disagree), but without providing detail on what movies the author feels avoid this pattern, they make their argument impossible to refute or engage with. (It also insulates the author’s tastes from criticism, which I suspect is part of the motivation)

replies(4): >>44571780 #>>44572105 #>>44573116 #>>44575200 #
dfxm12 ◴[] No.44572105[source]
Yeah, I can see where the author is coming from, but it's kinda effortless to dismiss a ~2hr movie with a five sentence critique of a few scenes or lines of dialog. I'd much rather see the author go deep on one movie than shallowly take on a bunch.
replies(1): >>44574961 #