←back to thread

Ask HN: Is it time to fork HN into AI/LLM and "Everything else/other?"

468 points bookofjoe | 1 comments | 15 Jul 25 14:51 UTC | HN request time: 0.209s | source

I would very much like to enjoy HN the way I did years ago, as a place where I'd discover things that I never otherwise would have come across.

The increasing AI/LLM domination of the site has made it much less appealing to me.

Show context
ksec ◴[15 Jul 25 17:11 UTC] No.44573458[source]▶
People who are a little late to the site may not know there was a time on HN where Erlang has even more frontage submission than the best of AI / LLM.

Ruby Rails, Postgres, SQLite, Rust, etc. They all have their moments and I dont think LLM right now is as overwhelming as any other hyped moments. Certainly not Erlang.

replies(12): >>44573486 #>>44573519 #>>44573551 #>>44573679 #>>44574106 #>>44574213 #>>44574337 #>>44574455 #>>44575092 #>>44575245 #>>44575493 #>>44576134 #
antonymoose ◴[15 Jul 25 17:16 UTC] No.44573519[source]▶
It all depends if you care about the tech side of HN or the startup side of HN. I love the tech articles above all else and could easily do without the general trend fluff.

With that said, I don’t find the AI posts nearly as bad as the Blockchain era.

replies(2): >>44573990 #>>44574679 #
devmor ◴[15 Jul 25 17:56 UTC] No.44573990[source]▶
As annoyed as I am with the constant deluge of uninteresting AI/LLM articles, I would much rather see a split between tech and startup news. I think that's a lasting and useful distinction.
replies(3): >>44574249 #>>44574429 #>>44574703 #
sshine ◴[15 Jul 25 18:38 UTC] No.44574429[source]▶
Lobste.rs provides that distinction.
replies(2): >>44574487 #>>44574880 #
1. sugarpimpdorsey ◴[15 Jul 25 19:24 UTC] No.44574880[source]▶
A socially awkward speakeasy with deranged moderation?

Where do I sign up?

A forum that is exclusionary-by-design has already failed.