←back to thread

234 points gloxkiqcza | 5 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
moktonar ◴[] No.44573420[source]
Time to make our own internet…
replies(1): >>44573542 #
1. RamblingCTO ◴[] No.44573542[source]
there are so many approaches already tho. yggdrasil, ipfs, tor, freifunk, meshtastic, i2p (mixing a lot of things here, but there is tech out there). so much cool stuff, we just gotta use it.
replies(1): >>44575016 #
2. boramalper ◴[] No.44575016[source]
> ipfs

IPFS have content blocking already: https://badbits.dwebops.pub/

replies(1): >>44580388 #
3. RamblingCTO ◴[] No.44580388[source]
well it's a slippery slope. you exist in existing jurisdictions and I'd rather not host CSAM tbh
replies(1): >>44580727 #
4. boramalper ◴[] No.44580727{3}[source]
They could've defined it as multiple filter lists for different kinds of content like uBlock does, but they chose not to. Therefore, anyone who (understandably and rightfully) want to block CSAM etc are now inadvertently blocking everything else that Protocol Labs disagrees with (e.g. copyright violation).
replies(1): >>44581752 #
5. RamblingCTO ◴[] No.44581752{4}[source]
fair criticism then