←back to thread

LLM Inevitabilism

(tomrenner.com)
1613 points SwoopsFromAbove | 1 comments | 15 Jul 25 04:35 UTC | HN request time: 0.21s | source
Show context
Workaccount2 ◴[15 Jul 25 12:54 UTC] No.44570646[source]▶
People like communicating in natural language.

LLMs are the first step in the movement away from the "early days" of computing where you needed to learn the logic based language and interface of computers to interact with them.

That is where the inevitabilism comes from. No one* wants to learn how to use a computer, they want it to be another entity that they can just talk to.

*I'm rounding off the <5% who deeply love computers.

replies(15): >>44570755 #>>44570832 #>>44570838 #>>44571025 #>>44571126 #>>44571238 #>>44571322 #>>44571750 #>>44572127 #>>44572396 #>>44572611 #>>44573565 #>>44573713 #>>44574762 #>>44576068 #
hinkley ◴[15 Jul 25 14:51 UTC] No.44571750[source]▶
If there was a way to explain contracts in natural language, don’t you think lawyers would have figured it out by now? How much GDP do we waste on one party thinking the contract says they paid for one thing but they got something else?
replies(2): >>44571915 #>>44572284 #
1. 827a ◴[15 Jul 25 15:06 UTC] No.44571915[source]▶
There's a potentially interesting idea in the space of: The cryptobros went really deep into trying to describe everything Up To And Including The World in computer code, with things like Etherium contracts, tokenization of corporate voting power, etc. That's all dead now, but you have to have some respect for the very techno-utopian idea that we can extend the power and predictability of Computer Code into everything; and its interesting how LLMs were the next techno-trend, yet totally reversed it. Now, its: computer code doesn't matter, only natural language matters, describe everything in natural language including computer code.