←back to thread

I solved the century-old mystery of a shipwreck survivor

(thewalrus.ca)
94 points Thevet | 2 comments | 12 Jul 25 22:24 UTC | HN request time: 0.55s | source
1. chiffre01 ◴[15 Jul 25 14:24 UTC] No.44571468[source]▶
Claiming the disaster was worse than the Titanic seems pretty thin just because more passenger lives were lost?

Total Lives lost:

Titanic: 1,500 Empress of Ireland: 1,012

replies(1): >>44571694 #
2. mattlondon ◴[15 Jul 25 14:47 UTC] No.44571694[source]▶
There was also a suggestion that more people knew about the titanic because there were more upper-class people on the titanic and no one cares about poor people or some other social commentary like that, which I think is disingenuous.

I suspect titanic is/was more well known is simply due to the sheer hubris of it all - a much-heralded and much-trumpeted "unsinkable ship" that sank on its maiden voyage. It was supposed to be this amazing new technical marvel and yet it did the very thing it that they were claiming was impossible on it's very first trip. Sticks in the mind somewhat, compared to the frequent "ordinary" ship sinkings that happen all the time (then and yes ships still sink now, although fewer passenger ships I expect but probably just down to their being fewer of them)