←back to thread

231 points frogulis | 6 comments | | HN request time: 3.881s | source | bottom
1. neuroelectron ◴[] No.44571129[source]
New Yorker is plagued by shallow snobbery. A kind of assumed elitism based on geographic location and a specific demographic. What makes their opinions so correct? Rich people agree with them.

Of course, we have a term for this, luxury beliefs.

replies(2): >>44571207 #>>44571712 #
2. mpalmer ◴[] No.44571207[source]
"I don't have to read or argue with this, it's automatically bad because uh elitism"

Now that's what I call a luxury belief!

replies(1): >>44571393 #
3. phyzome ◴[] No.44571423{3}[source]
Keep your AI slop to yourself, please.
replies(1): >>44576770 #
4. antognini ◴[] No.44571712[source]
That's not exactly what is meant by luxury beliefs. Luxury beliefs aren't simply beliefs that rich people hold. It more refers to social opinions which would (allegedly) impose high costs on the poor, but from which the wealthy would be insulated from the consequences. Something like "defund the police" is usually pointed to as an example of a luxury belief. The poor, who live in high crime areas, would see crime go up and bear the brunt of the consequences. Whereas the rich, who live in pricey, low crime neighborhoods, wouldn't see much of a change and would be able to afford private security anyhow if they did.
replies(1): >>44572054 #
5. neuroelectron ◴[] No.44572054[source]
It's a luxury belief in the sense that they're in a position to have an impact on the zeitgeist. People have been complaining about bad movies for a while now but now The New Yorker has an opinion. The rest of us proles can't afford Broadway. We get what we're served.
6. neuroelectron ◴[] No.44576770{4}[source]
Sorry I'm not going to retype myself what has been common knowledge for decades.