←back to thread

Bypassing Google's big anti-adblock update

(0x44.xyz)
1036 points deryilz | 1 comments | 12 Jul 25 19:06 UTC | HN request time: 0.263s | source
Show context
raydenvm ◴[13 Jul 25 07:07 UTC] No.44548145[source]▶
I suppose that switching to Brave will be one of the best solutions after all. They have already comment this in June: https://brave.com/blog/brave-shields-manifest-v3
replies(3): >>44549491 #>>44550071 #>>44551563 #
moffkalast ◴[13 Jul 25 11:27 UTC] No.44549491[source]▶
What makes Brave trustworthy enough for us to run our entire life through it? For me it's irreparably forever tainted by crypto grifting.
replies(2): >>44551033 #>>44551098 #
esskay ◴[13 Jul 25 15:29 UTC] No.44551098[source]▶
The 'crypto grifting' is something you can turn off completely, it's there as a way to make the browser sustainable without accepting payments from Google to make it the default search engine.

I'd argue its far more trustworthy than modern day Firefox/Mozilla, they're not exactly the second coming these days.

What makes Firefox more trustworthy?

replies(3): >>44551617 #>>44552019 #>>44565314 #
asadotzler ◴[14 Jul 25 21:07 UTC] No.44565314[source]▶
"You can turn off the evil feature that evil people added" isn't really an argument that's gonna convince me that evil people are trustworthy.

Tell me I can turn off the evil intent, and not just one of its manifestations, and we're in business. But you can't tell me that.

replies(1): >>44570148 #
1. esskay ◴[15 Jul 25 11:45 UTC] No.44570148[source]▶
By that logic you'd have to extend the same argument to Firefox, Chrome and Edge. All have a bunch of "evil" (which by your own definition evil = thing that makes a business money) things that can be disabled.

Once you've done that you're back to the same old question - why is <other browser> any better/safe/trustworth than Brave, which is arguably the only one that's gone out of their way to make sure its sustainable and not reliant on farming user data to the highest broker.