←back to thread

502 points alazsengul | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.212s | source
Show context
pm90 ◴[] No.44564397[source]
I think the amount of turmoil around these deals is giving more weight to the possibility that we’re in a massive bubble thats quite divorced from any kind of fundamentals. Sooner or later the bubbles gonna burst.
replies(13): >>44564436 #>>44564444 #>>44564507 #>>44564837 #>>44564856 #>>44564871 #>>44565061 #>>44566422 #>>44568840 #>>44570092 #>>44570792 #>>44571345 #>>44572790 #
yomismoaqui ◴[] No.44564444[source]
Remember that the web also had a bubble that popped and look at where are we now with Google, Amazon, Meta...

I think that there is a bubble but it's shaped more like the web bubble and less like the crypto bubble.

replies(3): >>44564476 #>>44564600 #>>44564897 #
theappsecguy ◴[] No.44564476[source]
“Web” is such a broad category. Quite a leap from LLM wrappers.
replies(1): >>44564702 #
joe_the_user ◴[] No.44564702[source]
Well, LLMs are themselves very broad. They encompass everything from web search to everything that you could automate yourself but don't have the time.

I don't LLM capacities have to reach human-equivalent for their uses to multiply for years to come.

I don't LLM technology as it exists can reach AGI by the simple addition of more compute power and moreover, I don't think adding computer necessarily is going to provide proportionate benefit (indeed, someone pointed-out that the current talent race acknowledges that brute-force has likely had it's day and some other "magic" is needed. Unlike brute-force, technical advances can't be summoned at will).

replies(3): >>44565016 #>>44565163 #>>44569989 #
1. mort96 ◴[] No.44569989[source]
LLMs don't seem very broad. You're literally just talking about predictive text engines.