←back to thread

548 points nsagent | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
lukev ◴[] No.44567263[source]
So to make sure I understand, this would mean:

1. Programs built against MLX -> Can take advantage of CUDA-enabled chips

but not:

2. CUDA programs -> Can now run on Apple Silicon.

Because the #2 would be a copyright violation (specifically with respect to NVidia's famous moat).

Is this correct?

replies(9): >>44567309 #>>44567350 #>>44567355 #>>44567600 #>>44567699 #>>44568060 #>>44568194 #>>44570427 #>>44577999 #
saagarjha ◴[] No.44567309[source]
No, it's because doing 2 would be substantially harder.
replies(2): >>44567356 #>>44567414 #
hangonhn ◴[] No.44567414[source]
Is CUDA tied very closely to the Nvidia hardware and architecture so that all the abstraction would not make sense on other platforms? I know very little about hardware and low level software.

Thanks

replies(4): >>44567469 #>>44567535 #>>44568191 #>>44568597 #
1. pjmlp ◴[] No.44568597[source]
CUDA is an ecosystem, many keep failing to understand that, trying to copy only the C++ compiler.