←back to thread

502 points alazsengul | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.226s | source
Show context
akavi ◴[] No.44563370[source]
Is this purely the rump company left over from the Google pseudo-acquistion? Or does this mean that deal fell through?

Does this represent confirmation that there was no pro-rata compensation to common share holders in the Google deal?

I just have so many questions.

replies(2): >>44563594 #>>44563679 #
xnx ◴[] No.44563594[source]
And what is Google "paying $2.4 billion in license fees" to use Windsurf's technology for, and to who? Does Windsurf have any technology?
replies(3): >>44563736 #>>44567751 #>>44570794 #
mattlondon ◴[] No.44563736[source]
I suspect it is more a "licence" for the things in the staff's heads for those who were poached.
replies(1): >>44567813 #
1. whamlastxmas ◴[] No.44567813[source]
And this highlights why intellectual property is really gross to me