←back to thread

548 points nsagent | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.662s | source
Show context
orliesaurus ◴[] No.44566950[source]
Why is this a big deal, can anyone explain if they are familiar with the space?
replies(1): >>44566980 #
elpakal ◴[] No.44566980[source]
> NVIDIA hardware is widely used for academic and massive computations. Being able to write/test code locally on a Mac and then deploy to super computers would make a good developer experience.

That one stands out to me as a mac user.

replies(1): >>44567030 #
radicaldreamer ◴[] No.44567030[source]
MacBooks used to use Nvidia GPUs, then Apple had a falling out with Nvidia and the beef stands to this day (Apple didn’t use Nvidia hardware when training it’s own LLMs for Apple Intelligence).

I wouldn’t be surprised if within the next few years we see a return of Nvidia hardware to the Mac, probably starting with low volume products like the MacPro, strictly for professional/high-end use cases.

replies(1): >>44567035 #
1. fooker ◴[] No.44567035[source]
> Apple didn’t use Nvidia hardware when training it’s own LLMs for Apple Intelligence

Do you have some links for this?

replies(2): >>44567137 #>>44567264 #
2. almostgotcaught ◴[] No.44567137[source]
People on hn make up more BS than your local bar

https://www.investors.com/news/technology/apple-stock-apple-...

replies(1): >>44569107 #
3. dialup_sounds ◴[] No.44567264[source]
https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.21075

tl;dr - they used Google TPUs

4. tgma ◴[] No.44569107[source]
What did the poster make up? There's one line where they speculated about future and a commentary about beef existing to this day which is subjective but the rest of it was 100% factual: Apple relied on Google for training their LLM for various reasons and they did have a beef with NVIDIA re MacBooks a long time ago after which they switched the entire line to AMD Graphics.