←back to thread

548 points nsagent | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.228s | source
Show context
teaearlgraycold ◴[] No.44566013[source]
I wonder if Jensen is scared. If this opens up the door to other implementations this could be a real threat to Nvidia. CUDA on AMD, CUDA on Intel, etc. Might we see actual competition?
replies(5): >>44566022 #>>44566220 #>>44566251 #>>44568609 #>>44573914 #
jsight ◴[] No.44566022[source]
I think this is the other way around. It won't be cuda on anything except for nvidia.

However, this might make mlx into a much stronger competitor for Pytorch.

replies(3): >>44566028 #>>44566091 #>>44566435 #
baby_souffle ◴[] No.44566091[source]
If you implement compatible apis, are you prohibited from calling it cuda?
replies(2): >>44566119 #>>44566131 #
1. 15155 ◴[] No.44566131[source]
Considering 100% of the low-level CUDA API headers have the word "CUDA" in them, this would be interesting to know.