←back to thread

360 points namlem | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
retrac ◴[] No.44562032[source]
The technical term is sortition. And it is my pet unorthodox political position. The legislature should be replaced with an assembly of citizens picked by lottery.
replies(22): >>44562101 #>>44562171 #>>44562282 #>>44562381 #>>44562409 #>>44562535 #>>44562693 #>>44562879 #>>44562889 #>>44562956 #>>44562965 #>>44563058 #>>44563183 #>>44563590 #>>44564320 #>>44564823 #>>44565767 #>>44566093 #>>44572194 #>>44572213 #>>44572628 #>>44573260 #
gameman144 ◴[] No.44562101[source]
This may show that I'm biased, but the idea of a randomized group of citizens making the law of the land scares the heck out of me. There is a non-trivial amount of nuance and compromise that goes in lawmaking.

Now, the idea of electing a few thousand representatives and having sortition determine who is actually selected is something I could feasibly get behind.

replies(14): >>44562205 #>>44562207 #>>44562350 #>>44562367 #>>44562501 #>>44562713 #>>44562716 #>>44562771 #>>44563329 #>>44563537 #>>44564233 #>>44564610 #>>44569821 #>>44571062 #
keiferski ◴[] No.44562713[source]
I think it could work well if you added two things:

1. A filtering mechanism after the selection process. E.g., basic civics questions like how many states are there, a background check, and so on. To make sure you don't pick anyone that's compromised or incapable of serving.

2. A training program that acclimates new members to the system. If terms are say, six years long, then the first year can be entirely devoted to training.

replies(4): >>44563000 #>>44563013 #>>44564409 #>>44565546 #
1. pintxo ◴[] No.44563000{3}[source]
This training thingy sounds sensible. But who controls the contents of the training? That body will have quite some power.
replies(1): >>44563150 #
2. keiferski ◴[] No.44563150[source]
Could just make it as a public-based majority referendum type thing, and keep it extremely simple. I don't think it would need to be very complicated. You just want to filter out the truly insane people.
replies(1): >>44565174 #
3. sampl3username ◴[] No.44565174[source]
The actually dangerous people are not the obviously insane, but the machiavellian dark triad types. Those will pass your test.
replies(1): >>44567953 #
4. keiferski ◴[] No.44567953{3}[source]
I think the current political system probably selects more for that type of person than my proposed randomized one, in which they are far less likely to be chosen vs. an average well-adjusted person.