←back to thread

360 points namlem | 6 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source | bottom
Show context
retrac ◴[] No.44562032[source]
The technical term is sortition. And it is my pet unorthodox political position. The legislature should be replaced with an assembly of citizens picked by lottery.
replies(22): >>44562101 #>>44562171 #>>44562282 #>>44562381 #>>44562409 #>>44562535 #>>44562693 #>>44562879 #>>44562889 #>>44562956 #>>44562965 #>>44563058 #>>44563183 #>>44563590 #>>44564320 #>>44564823 #>>44565767 #>>44566093 #>>44572194 #>>44572213 #>>44572628 #>>44573260 #
1. k__ ◴[] No.44562381[source]
Haha, mine too.

It would probably make sense to start with a new new "house" or something.

Might even make sense to have some quotas (at least 50% women etc.), so the whole things doesn't have to get to Chinese government size to reflect the populus.

That or pepple would have to be replaced with high frequency

replies(1): >>44562611 #
2. bilbo0s ◴[] No.44562611[source]
If it's truly random, it should already be 50-52% female.

If it comes out 10% female every sortition cohort, you know some funny business is going on.

replies(2): >>44562907 #>>44564616 #
3. k__ ◴[] No.44562907[source]
Isn't this a question of how many people you select?
replies(2): >>44562987 #>>44563083 #
4. ◴[] No.44562987{3}[source]
5. bilbo0s ◴[] No.44563083{3}[source]
Sure.

My point is that so is the percentage of males in any sortition cohort.

Therefore, a consistent female census of 10% or less in all sortition cohorts, would be as unlikely as a consistent male census of 10% or less in all sortition cohorts.

In other words, having one sortition cohort result in 10% males would not be suspicious. Having every sortition cohort result in 10% males would be suspicious in the extreme. So much so that we should start looking for whoever is "putting their finger on the scale" so to speak.

6. breuleux ◴[] No.44564616[source]
If the sample size is low, it could come out at 10% purely at random, but that is still likely to undermine confidence in the system (in the immediate). Pragmatically, I think it makes sense to have quotas for a few protected classes, to maximize perception of fairness.