←back to thread

1016 points QuinnyPig | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.234s | source
1. gsibble ◴[] No.44561748[source]
Am I the only one who finds AI not very helpful?

Just this morning, Cursor was giving me a ton of incorrect tab completions. When I use prompts, it tends to break more than it fixes. It's still a lot faster to write by hand. Lots of libraries that take *arguments in Python also cannot be groked by AI.

replies(3): >>44561853 #>>44562798 #>>44563965 #
2. shermantanktop ◴[] No.44561853[source]
Of course you aren't the only one, and I'm sure you know that you aren't the only one.

I doubt these tools will ever convince every last person on every single use case, so the existence of those people isn't exactly an indictment.

3. lvl155 ◴[] No.44562798[source]
You have to put in some effort to put in the guardrails and scaffolds to make it produce what you want. It’s definitely not out-of-the-box deal.
4. neutronicus ◴[] No.44563965[source]
At work it's supremely unhelpful. Giant C++ codebase, big enough to choke even traditional analysis tools like IntelliSense, lots of proprietary libraries.

I have found it extremely useful for spinning up personal projects though.

My wife bought us Claude subscriptions and she's been straight-up vibe coding an educational game for our son with impressive results (she is a UX designer so a lot more attuned to vibes than gen-pop). I'm picking up some computational physics research threads I dropped in grad school and Claude Code has been incredible at everything besides physics and HPC. Define and parse an input file format, integrate I/O libraries, turn my slapdash notes into LaTeX with nice TiKz diagrams, etc.

Hoping I can transfer over some insights to make it more helpful at work.