←back to thread

67 points growbell_social | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source

Amidst the nascent concerns of AI replacing software engineers, it seems a proxy for that might be the amount of code written at OpenAI by the various models they have.

If AI is a threat to software engineering, I wouldn't expect many software engineers to actively accelerate that trend. I personally don't view it as a threat, but some people (non engineers?) obviously do.

I'd be curious if any OpenAI engineers can share a rough estimate of their day to day composition of human generated code vs AI generated.

Show context
notfried ◴[] No.44554230[source]
Not OpenAI, but Anthropic CPO Mike Krieger said in response to a question of how much of Claude Code is written by Claude Code: "At this point, I would be shocked if it wasn't 95% plus. I'd have to ask Boris and the other tech leads on there."

[0] https://www.lennysnewsletter.com/p/anthropics-cpo-heres-what...

replies(10): >>44554351 #>>44554371 #>>44554536 #>>44554691 #>>44555029 #>>44555126 #>>44555211 #>>44559459 #>>44562074 #>>44562426 #
1. alyxya ◴[] No.44555211[source]
It’s worth pointing out that the statement is about how much of Claude Code is written with it and not how much of the codebase of the whole company. In the more critical parts of the codebase where bugs can cause bigger problems, I expect a lot less code to be fully AI generated.