←back to thread

693 points macawfish | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
everdrive ◴[] No.44544268[source]
Others have said this, I'm sure, but this will move past porn _quickly_. Once there is agreed-up age verification for pornography, much of the professional internet will require identity verification to do _anything_. This is one of the bigger nails in the coffin for the free internet, and this true whether or not you're happy with all the pornography out there.
replies(8): >>44544359 #>>44544369 #>>44544497 #>>44545175 #>>44545690 #>>44550491 #>>44550525 #>>44550534 #
mathiaspoint ◴[] No.44550491[source]
Sharing/storing child porn is already illegal and punished far more harshly. So it's not like we've gone from zero to one. We've been censoring things people don't like for a little while now.
replies(1): >>44551183 #
3836293648 ◴[] No.44551183[source]
Sure, but that is a step from banning because it's harmful to the producer to banning because it's harmful to the consumer
replies(2): >>44555170 #>>44564344 #
1. mathiaspoint ◴[] No.44555170{3}[source]
Maybe if it were the creation of child porn that were illegal but that's not how the law is written.