[0] https://www.lennysnewsletter.com/p/anthropics-cpo-heres-what...
If AI is a threat to software engineering, I wouldn't expect many software engineers to actively accelerate that trend. I personally don't view it as a threat, but some people (non engineers?) obviously do.
I'd be curious if any OpenAI engineers can share a rough estimate of their day to day composition of human generated code vs AI generated.
[0] https://www.lennysnewsletter.com/p/anthropics-cpo-heres-what...
for some products.
If it were 95% of anything useful, Anthropic would not still have >1000 employees, and the rest of the economy would be collapsing, and governments would be taking some kind of action.
Yet none of that appears to be happening. Why?
I think firing people does not come as a logical conclusion of 95% of code being written by Claude Code. There is a big difference between AI autonomously writing code and developers just finding it easier to prompt changes rather than typing them manually.
In one case, you have an automated software engineer, and may be able to reduce your headcount. In the other, developers may just be slightly more productive or even just enjoy writing code using AI more, but the coding is still very much driven by the developers themselves. I think right now Claude Code shows signs of (1) for simple cases, but mostly falls into the (2) bucket.