←back to thread

Let me pay for Firefox

(discourse.mozilla.org)
803 points csmantle | 1 comments | 13 Jul 25 08:38 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
lenkite ◴[13 Jul 25 10:07 UTC] No.44549029[source]▶
I would happily pay monthly for Firefox - but not to Mozilla Corporation. Will Pay to developers, development support and operations - not to pad the CEO salary.
replies(3): >>44549205 #>>44549633 #>>44549707 #
DangerousPie ◴[13 Jul 25 12:00 UTC] No.44549707[source]▶
How are you expecting to run an entity with developers, support, and operations without any leadership?

I don't know if you have ever worked in a larger team that lacked someone to make decisions, take responsibility and set a strategy, but in my experience that is almost always a disaster.

replies(14): >>44549813 #>>44549853 #>>44549854 #>>44550582 #>>44550615 #>>44550705 #>>44550980 #>>44551464 #>>44551636 #>>44551822 #>>44552061 #>>44552313 #>>44552410 #>>44559439 #
IshKebab ◴[13 Jul 25 14:15 UTC] No.44550615[source]▶
I think you need a CEO, you just don't need a CEO that is paid $7m/year. That's ludicrous. What amazing decisions have they been making that were worth that amount? Have they really contributed more than a team of 70 developers could?

There are plenty of competent people that could be CEO for far less, like $200k/year.

replies(2): >>44551460 #>>44553886 #
1. noisy_boy ◴[13 Jul 25 16:16 UTC] No.44551460[source]▶
It doesn't even have to be that. Take that and bump it 5 times like a million dollars. Throw in more cash if they can increase Firefox's market share. Have clauses to penalize anything about opt-out telemetry or anti-privacy features. I'm happy to add more carrots as well as more sticks.

All said and done, that will still be way more reasonable than that ludicrous salary.