And then they promised to be the browser which would "protect your privacy"! Then they went on to do opt-out telemetry and claim ownership of user data so that was all a joke as well. The org deserves so much worse than it's grappling with.
You make it sound more noble than him trying to make his personal “ick” into binding law.
Specifically - it was his PERSONAL ideals, not affecting the company in any way, shape or form. THAT's why it is so outrageous.
If his ideals was something you disagreed with, would you then accept with Mozilla pushing him out?