(0x44.xyz)

1034 points deryilz | 1 comments | 12 Jul 25 19:06 UTC | HN request time: 0.211s | source

Show context

SuperShibe ◴[12 Jul 25 20:20 UTC] No.44544826[source]▶

[flagged]

replies(6): >>44544855 #>>44545234 #>>44546507 #>>44546656 #>>44546983 #>>44547982 #

Aurornis ◴[13 Jul 25 02:26 UTC] No.44546983[source]▶

If a major adblocker used a bug or security vulnerability to work around restrictions, it would have been patched away immediately.

The uBlock team was never going to ship code that depended on a bug to work.

replies(1): >>44548870 #

1. r4indeer ◴[13 Jul 25 09:37 UTC] No.44548870[source]▶

>>44546983 #

I fully agree. The original comment and the other replies to it are bewildering. There was nothing to gain here, yet people are throwing ad hominem attacks left and right.

↑

Bypassing Google's big anti-adblock update