←back to thread

1034 points deryilz | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.44s | source
1. sneak ◴[] No.44547429[source]
So theoretically Chrome is open source.

Open source is supposed to prevent issues like this, as it is possible to fork Chrome pre-MV3 and preserve this functionality.

However, this appears to have not happened.

Perhaps we need a better definition of “open source”, or well-funded organizations that are adversarial in nature to the maintainers of open source commercial software.

Lots of f/oss has malware and misfeatures in it, hiding behind the guise of “open source”. It doesn’t count unless there are non-corporate interests at work in the project that are willing and able to fork.

replies(2): >>44548426 #>>44548829 #
2. yard2010 ◴[] No.44548426[source]
Chrome is open source just like Russia and Iran are democratic dictatorships. Just in the naming.
3. arccy ◴[] No.44548829[source]
open source only means you can use and fork it without too many restrictions. it doesn't mean open governance or did the greater good.