←back to thread

Bypassing Google's big anti-adblock update

(0x44.xyz)
1034 points deryilz | 7 comments | 12 Jul 25 19:06 UTC | HN request time: 0.551s | source | bottom
Show context
zulban ◴[13 Jul 25 02:07 UTC] No.44546901[source]▶
I don't "bypass" Chrome when they want to melt my brain with their business model, I use Firefox. I don't "bypass" Windows when they want to melt my brain with their business model, I use Linux. No idea why so many "hackers" doing "bypasses" can't instead take action that is simpler, long lasting, and easier. Do people need to jerked around 50 times for 20 years before realizing it will keep happening and their "bypasses" are just temporary bandaids?
replies(25): >>44546992 #>>44547048 #>>44547056 #>>44547069 #>>44547113 #>>44547116 #>>44547135 #>>44547149 #>>44547168 #>>44547299 #>>44547355 #>>44547435 #>>44547619 #>>44547764 #>>44547831 #>>44547854 #>>44547934 #>>44547979 #>>44547987 #>>44547998 #>>44548000 #>>44548065 #>>44548153 #>>44551102 #>>44552201 #
1. arcfour ◴[13 Jul 25 02:28 UTC] No.44546992[source]▶
You should read the article before commenting; your comment is a non-sequitur.
replies(3): >>44547152 #>>44547303 #>>44547665 #
2. doctorpangloss ◴[13 Jul 25 03:04 UTC] No.44547152[source]▶
I don’t know. Eventually you read enough of this stuff and you would rather the next breath be, take leadership on a real solution. To me it’s a “sequitur” to say, the biggest fuck you is to convince people to stop using Chrome, not to fix bugs for their extremely highly paid engineers for free.
replies(1): >>44547257 #
3. spenczar5 ◴[13 Jul 25 03:30 UTC] No.44547257[source]▶
Uh sir the article is about JavaScript Browser APIS
replies(1): >>44551176 #
4. zulban ◴[13 Jul 25 03:42 UTC] No.44547303[source]▶
Right back at you. If you think my comment is a non-sequitur, maybe you didn't read the article?
replies(1): >>44547406 #
5. ◴[13 Jul 25 04:06 UTC] No.44547406[source]▶
6. bravesoul2 ◴[13 Jul 25 05:01 UTC] No.44547665[source]▶
It's a oui-sequitur for sure.
7. doctorpangloss ◴[13 Jul 25 15:38 UTC] No.44551176{3}[source]▶
every day, people are writing about javascript browser apis, why do you think we're reading about this one?