←back to thread

1036 points deryilz | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
daft_pink ◴[] No.44544532[source]
So what’s the conclusion? Can we use a different Chrome based browser and avoid MV3? What’s the decision for privacy after this has happened?
replies(4): >>44544726 #>>44544749 #>>44546394 #>>44547001 #
j45 ◴[] No.44544726[source]
The little I've read bout this says that maintaining MV2 might be something as well.

If other chromium based browsers didn't have this issue, that would be great, but likely in time Youtube won't support browsers that don't have MV3. Probably still have some time though.

replies(2): >>44544856 #>>44546518 #
1. shakna ◴[] No.44546518[source]
Google using YouTube to block non-MV3 browsers, would be Google picking a fight with Firefox - who they use in court documents to say that they're not a monopoly. Their legal team will have a few words to say about it.