←back to thread

1034 points deryilz | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.602s | source
1. alex1138 ◴[] No.44546435[source]
1) A lot of ads are terribly overdone and even sometimes actively malicious (malware or tracking). It makes no sense to aggressively try to stamp it out like Google is doing

2) Aside from the Page/Brin stealing tech salaries thing (yeah it really did happen) what happened to Google? They've always been a bit incompetent but their behavior (ie Chrome and increasing censorship on Google/Youtube the last few years) has been really bad, I thought they were basically founded off idealism

replies(3): >>44548651 #>>44550815 #>>44564672 #
2. jacquesm ◴[] No.44548651[source]
> and even sometimes actively malicious

Most of the times. In fact, the situations where they are not actively tracking are exceedingly rare.

3. acdha ◴[] No.44550815[source]
> Aside from the Page/Brin stealing tech salaries thing (yeah it really did happen) what happened to Google?

They bought DoubleClick in 2009, with an outcome similar to the way Boeing bought McDonnell-Douglas but their management culture was taken over by acquired company. They haven’t launched a popular product since and their preexisting products have clearly been shifting to an “ads justify the means” mentality over time.

4. RevEng ◴[] No.44564672[source]
Idealism does with capitalism. Executives and shareholders don't care about ideals: they want money. All of the questionable things Google has done have been in pursuit of ever larger profits.