←back to thread

Supreme Court's ruling practically wipes out free speech for sex writing online

(ellsberg.substack.com)
693 points macawfish | 1 comments | 12 Jul 25 18:14 UTC | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
soulofmischief ◴[12 Jul 25 18:59 UTC] No.44544204[source]▶
[flagged]
replies(5): >>44544238 #>>44544534 #>>44545635 #>>44546638 #>>44547781 #
chgs ◴[12 Jul 25 19:40 UTC] No.44544534[source]▶
If the Supreme Court agrees they are constitutional then they clearly are constitutional, unless you think the constitution doesn’t apply
replies(7): >>44544713 #>>44545467 #>>44546022 #>>44546475 #>>44547154 #>>44547260 #>>44547702 #
1. cocacola1 ◴[12 Jul 25 23:14 UTC] No.44546022[source]▶
Not really. The Supreme Court believes some rulings to be wrong the day they were decided:

> “The dissent’s reference to Korematsu, however, affords this Court the opportunity to make express what is already obvious: *Korematsu was gravely wrong the day it was decided*, has been overruled in the court of history, and to be clear ‘has no place in law under the Constitution,’” Roberts said, quoting Justice Jackson’s 1944 dissent.