Most active commenters

    ←back to thread

    Bypassing Google's big anti-adblock update

    (0x44.xyz)
    1034 points deryilz | 14 comments | 12 Jul 25 19:06 UTC | HN request time: 1.032s | source | bottom
    Show context
    al_borland ◴[12 Jul 25 20:51 UTC] No.44545060[source]▶
    Even if bigs exists to work around what Google is doing, that isn’t the right way forward. If people don’t agree with Google move, the only correct course of action is to ditch Chrome (and all Chromium browsers). Hit them where it hurts and take away their monopoly over the future direction of the web.
    replies(26): >>44545103 #>>44545185 #>>44545382 #>>44545931 #>>44545951 #>>44546164 #>>44546522 #>>44546599 #>>44546664 #>>44546763 #>>44547531 #>>44548200 #>>44548246 #>>44548399 #>>44548418 #>>44548820 #>>44549698 #>>44550098 #>>44550599 #>>44551061 #>>44551130 #>>44551663 #>>44553615 #>>44554220 #>>44556476 #>>44571602 #
    1. janalsncm ◴[12 Jul 25 23:03 UTC] No.44545951[source]▶
    “Sorry, we don’t support any browsers other than Chrome”

    I agree exploiting a bug isn’t a sustainable solution. But it’s also unrealistic to think switching is viable.

    replies(6): >>44546025 #>>44546030 #>>44546084 #>>44546107 #>>44546632 #>>44548350 #
    2. oehpr ◴[12 Jul 25 23:14 UTC] No.44546025[source]▶
    Keep chrome installed and fall back iff forced to. That way the majority of usage statistics show up as other browsers so when developers are making guesses at which browser to support, those statistics will push them away from chrome.

    Additionally: you would be surprised how infrequently you have to switch to chrome

    replies(3): >>44546064 #>>44546157 #>>44546540 #
    3. tankenmate ◴[12 Jul 25 23:15 UTC] No.44546030[source]▶
    By that logic attempting to change anything at all is not viable; e pur si muove.
    4. zos_kia ◴[12 Jul 25 23:20 UTC] No.44546064[source]▶
    Can't remember the last time I actually had to open a website on chrome for compatibility reasons. Is that still a thing?
    replies(2): >>44546150 #>>44546479 #
    5. bayindirh ◴[12 Jul 25 23:23 UTC] No.44546084[source]▶
    For me “switching” is to start using something else rather than Firefox, so switching from Chrome is viable.
    6. slenk ◴[12 Jul 25 23:27 UTC] No.44546107[source]▶
    Most sites let you ignore that, but just keep like Ungoogled Chromium around as a backup
    7. Steven420 ◴[12 Jul 25 23:34 UTC] No.44546150{3}[source]▶
    I only have to switch to chrome for e-transfers. Everything else seems to work
    8. Andrew_nenakhov ◴[12 Jul 25 23:35 UTC] No.44546157[source]▶
    Btw, the 'website requires chrome browser' problem is often solved if you just make Firefox user agent say it is Chrome.
    replies(1): >>44546195 #
    9. XorNot ◴[12 Jul 25 23:43 UTC] No.44546195{3}[source]▶
    The problem is this needs to be a standard Firefox feature.
    10. julianz ◴[13 Jul 25 00:39 UTC] No.44546479{3}[source]▶
    The F1TV site didn't work on Firefox earlier this year but send to be fixed now, other than that I haven't had any issues.
    11. 8n4vidtmkvmk ◴[13 Jul 25 00:53 UTC] No.44546540[source]▶
    There's one site I have to switch to Firefox for. And it's a big one that handles a lot of money, so that's kind of surprising. Can't log into their site in chrome, no matter how hard I try. Nor edge.
    12. userbinator ◴[13 Jul 25 01:09 UTC] No.44546632[source]▶
    Find who is responsible for such sites and send them strongly-worded emails. If it's a commerce site, tell them they just lost a potential customer. In my experience it's usually the trendchasing web developers who have drunk the Goog-Aid and are trying to convince the others in the organisation to use "modern" (read: controlled by Google) features and waste time implementing these changes --- instead of the "deprecated" feature that's been there for decades and will work in just about any browser, and the management is usually more driven by $$$ so anything that affects the bottom line is going to get their attention. I've even offered to "fix" their site for free to make it more accessible.
    replies(1): >>44553173 #
    13. yard2010 ◴[13 Jul 25 07:48 UTC] No.44548350[source]▶
    "This site requires Internet Explorer 6 to work"
    14. janalsncm ◴[13 Jul 25 20:00 UTC] No.44553173[source]▶
    This is common on internal company websites. Devs only support chrome officially.