←back to thread

Bypassing Google's big anti-adblock update

(0x44.xyz)
1034 points deryilz | 1 comments | 12 Jul 25 19:06 UTC | HN request time: 0.248s | source
Show context
al_borland ◴[12 Jul 25 20:51 UTC] No.44545060[source]▶
Even if bigs exists to work around what Google is doing, that isn’t the right way forward. If people don’t agree with Google move, the only correct course of action is to ditch Chrome (and all Chromium browsers). Hit them where it hurts and take away their monopoly over the future direction of the web.
replies(26): >>44545103 #>>44545185 #>>44545382 #>>44545931 #>>44545951 #>>44546164 #>>44546522 #>>44546599 #>>44546664 #>>44546763 #>>44547531 #>>44548200 #>>44548246 #>>44548399 #>>44548418 #>>44548820 #>>44549698 #>>44550098 #>>44550599 #>>44551061 #>>44551130 #>>44551663 #>>44553615 #>>44554220 #>>44556476 #>>44571602 #
high_priest ◴[12 Jul 25 20:58 UTC] No.44545103[source]▶
Its not happening
replies(4): >>44545238 #>>44545244 #>>44545297 #>>44545919 #
Etheryte ◴[12 Jul 25 21:16 UTC] No.44545238[source]▶
I don't know, I switched to Safari and it was painful for like two hours and then I stopped thinking about it. The only thing I somewhat miss is the built-in page translate, but I don't need it often enough to be bothered much.
replies(3): >>44545267 #>>44545318 #>>44545577 #
1. notatoad ◴[12 Jul 25 22:03 UTC] No.44545577[source]▶
switching to safari because chrome disabled the good adblockers is completely counter-productive. safari has never supported the good adblockers.