←back to thread

1036 points deryilz | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
daft_pink ◴[] No.44544532[source]
So what’s the conclusion? Can we use a different Chrome based browser and avoid MV3? What’s the decision for privacy after this has happened?
replies(4): >>44544726 #>>44544749 #>>44546394 #>>44547001 #
j45 ◴[] No.44544726[source]
The little I've read bout this says that maintaining MV2 might be something as well.

If other chromium based browsers didn't have this issue, that would be great, but likely in time Youtube won't support browsers that don't have MV3. Probably still have some time though.

replies(2): >>44544856 #>>44546518 #
SSchick ◴[] No.44544856[source]
Switched to Firefox yesterday, I suggest you do the same.
replies(3): >>44545114 #>>44545239 #>>44545279 #
dwedge ◴[] No.44545239[source]
Are they still funded to the tune of a billion a year by Google so that Google can pretend they don't have a monopoly? Are they still intent on redefining as an ad company?
replies(2): >>44545396 #>>44545483 #
1. j45 ◴[] No.44545396{3}[source]
When the billion began Chrome wasn't even a browser yet.