←back to thread

1034 points deryilz | 9 comments | | HN request time: 0.544s | source | bottom
1. 4gotunameagain ◴[] No.44544855[source]
Well, in his defense it would have been patched immediately after the first adblocker used it, and he would have gotten nothing at all out of it.

Oh wait he got nothing at all anyway ;)

replies(2): >>44544888 #>>44545091 #
2. freed0mdox ◴[] No.44544888[source]
Not really, this sort of fame farming is what makes candidates stand out in infosec interviews. A bug in Google systems is good for his future career.
replies(2): >>44546313 #>>44547352 #
3. m4rtink ◴[] No.44545091[source]
Would be quite different if they patched it and broke important extensions, possibly facing serieous outcry and bad publicity.
replies(3): >>44545271 #>>44545323 #>>44545582 #
4. devnullbrain ◴[] No.44545271[source]
That's what they already did.
5. rollcat ◴[] No.44545323[source]
Important extensions like, dunno, uBlock Origin?
replies(1): >>44545924 #
6. deryilz ◴[] No.44545582[source]
I agree that would change things but I can't picture an open-source extension with millions of users pivoting to rely on something that's clearly a bug.
replies(1): >>44547361 #
7. eddythompson80 ◴[] No.44545924{3}[source]
Yeah, surely if chrome broke important extensions people will get mad and switch.
8. lucb1e ◴[] No.44546313[source]
The post says they had another bug with a large bounty in the same year, so it doesn't seem very useful for CV padding either
9. userbinator ◴[] No.44547361{3}[source]
At that point it's a feature, not a bug.

Having millions of users on your side is great ammunition.