←back to thread

693 points macawfish | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
bigyabai[dead post] ◴[] No.44544106[source]
[flagged]
recursivecaveat ◴[] No.44544356[source]
It received 200+ comments at the time it happened... https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44397799
replies(1): >>44544771 #
1. Terr_ ◴[] No.44544771[source]
Exposure != Accumulated comments, especially if you aren't counting distinct authors.

Dig a little deeper, and you'll see that particular submission ("US Supreme Court Upholds Texas Porn ID Law") was visible on the front page for barely five minutes [0] before something abruptly exiled it to to the end of the second page and a slide into obscurity.

In contrast, I randomly picked something from several pages down today that which looks bland with triple-digit comments, and got "A Typology of Candianisms." Turns out that has even more comments (327!) and was visible on the front page for about twenty hours [1].

Quite a difference, isn't it? I'm not against the idea that HN needs to guard its content-mix, but we should not live in denial about it happening.

[0] https://hnrankings.info/44397799/

[1] https://hnrankings.info/44515101/