←back to thread

236 points martinald | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.445s | source
Show context
ryao ◴[] No.44538755[source]
Am I the only one who thinks mention of “safety tests” for LLMs is a marketing scheme? Cars, planes and elevators have safety tests. LLMs don’t. Nobody is going to die if a LLM gives an output that its creators do not like, yet when they say “safety tests”, they mean that they are checking to what extent the LLM will say things they do not like.
replies(12): >>44538785 #>>44538805 #>>44538808 #>>44538903 #>>44538929 #>>44539030 #>>44539924 #>>44540225 #>>44540905 #>>44542283 #>>44542952 #>>44543574 #
natrius ◴[] No.44538808[source]
An LLM can trivially instruct someone to take medications with adverse interactions, steer a mental health crisis toward suicide, or make a compelling case that a particular ethnic group is the cause of your society's biggest problem so they should be eliminated. Words can't kill people, but words can definitely lead to deaths.

That's not even considering tool use!

replies(12): >>44538847 #>>44538877 #>>44538896 #>>44538914 #>>44539109 #>>44539685 #>>44539785 #>>44539805 #>>44540111 #>>44542360 #>>44542401 #>>44542586 #
bongodongobob ◴[] No.44538896[source]
Books can do this too.
replies(3): >>44538935 #>>44539649 #>>44540596 #
ben_w ◴[] No.44540596[source]
There's a reason the inherititors of the coyright* refused to allow more copies of Mein Kampf to be produced until that copyright expired.

* the federal state of Bavaria

replies(1): >>44542854 #
1. nofriend ◴[] No.44542854[source]
Was there? It seems like that was the perfect natural experiment then. So what was the outcome? Was there a sudden rash of holocausts the year that publishing started again?
replies(1): >>44543945 #
2. ben_w ◴[] No.44543945[source]
> Was there a sudden rash of holocausts the year that publishing started again?

Bit worse than the baseline, I'd say. You judge: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_genocides

2016 was also first Trump, Brexit, and roughly when the AfD (who are metaphorically wading ankle deep in the waters of legal trouble of this topic) made the transition from "joke party" to "political threat".