←back to thread

226 points martinald | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.209s | source
Show context
ryao ◴[] No.44538755[source]
Am I the only one who thinks mention of “safety tests” for LLMs is a marketing scheme? Cars, planes and elevators have safety tests. LLMs don’t. Nobody is going to die if a LLM gives an output that its creators do not like, yet when they say “safety tests”, they mean that they are checking to what extent the LLM will say things they do not like.
replies(12): >>44538785 #>>44538805 #>>44538808 #>>44538903 #>>44538929 #>>44539030 #>>44539924 #>>44540225 #>>44540905 #>>44542283 #>>44542952 #>>44543574 #
natrius ◴[] No.44538808[source]
An LLM can trivially instruct someone to take medications with adverse interactions, steer a mental health crisis toward suicide, or make a compelling case that a particular ethnic group is the cause of your society's biggest problem so they should be eliminated. Words can't kill people, but words can definitely lead to deaths.

That's not even considering tool use!

replies(12): >>44538847 #>>44538877 #>>44538896 #>>44538914 #>>44539109 #>>44539685 #>>44539785 #>>44539805 #>>44540111 #>>44542360 #>>44542401 #>>44542586 #
thayne ◴[] No.44539109[source]
Part of the problem is due to the marketing of LLMs as more capable and trustworthy than they really are.

And the safety testing actually makes this worse, because it leads people to trust that LLMs are less likely to give dangerous advice, when they could still do so.

replies(2): >>44540964 #>>44541795 #
1. brookst ◴[] No.44541795[source]
Can you point to a specific bit of marketing that says to take whatever medications a LLM suggests, or other similar overreach?

People keep talking about this “marketing”, and I have yet to see a single example.