←back to thread

785 points rcchen | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.235s | source
Show context
dalemhurley ◴[] No.44537376[source]
Cursor (and Garry Tan’s X post) has shown us that the VC money is propping up these companies astounding growth, the only way for them to become profitable is to increase the cost per a request, which means they need to innovate like crazy.

The moat is paper thin.

GitHub has open sourced copilot.

The open source community is working hard on their own projects.

No doubt Cursor is moving fast to create amazing innovations, but if the competition only focuses on thin wrappers they are not worth the billion dollar valuations.

I love watching this space as it is moving extremely fast.

replies(7): >>44537680 #>>44537693 #>>44537910 #>>44537998 #>>44538331 #>>44540883 #>>44542513 #
woeirua ◴[] No.44537910[source]
There is no moat. If you’re a true believer that strong agents are around the corner, then all of these add on companies will be obsolete in a few years. The first company to strong agents can trivially rebuild Cursor or Windsurf.
replies(1): >>44538414 #
herval ◴[] No.44538414[source]
If you believe AGI is around the corner, doesn’t it mean it’ll replace ALL products?
replies(5): >>44538510 #>>44539451 #>>44539920 #>>44540096 #>>44541572 #
1. TrackerFF ◴[] No.44541572[source]
If AGI is around the corner, I don't believe one single company will "own" that tech. It will be like it is today, where you have multiple models competing.

And after that, AGI will be open source.

In the end, ownership of data and compute will be the things that define the victors.