←back to thread

AWS Free Tier Changes on July 15, 2025

(freetier.co)
46 points coop182 | 4 comments | 11 Jul 25 23:16 UTC | HN request time: 0.833s | source
Show context
Traubenfuchs ◴[12 Jul 25 07:24 UTC] No.44540028[source]▶
I have a terraformed 4 node kubernetes cluster with 6GB RAM each running on the oracle cloud free tier.

I don‘t know why people bother with any other cloud if they are free tier level hobbyists.

replies(4): >>44540393 #>>44540508 #>>44540936 #>>44540941 #
1. trvz ◴[12 Jul 25 08:43 UTC] No.44540393[source]▶
As another advocate for Oracle Cloud, I think people primarily aren't aware of it, and if they are they are put off by Oracle's reputation, even though Oracle Cloud is no worse than AWS/GC/Azure.
replies(1): >>44540541 #
2. floating-io ◴[12 Jul 25 09:11 UTC] No.44540541[source]▶
Signing up for services with a notoriously complex pricing structure, under the auspices of a company that is infamous for auditing its customers and forcing more money out of them on the basis of technicalities under threat of legal action, seems... unwise... to me.
replies(1): >>44540925 #
3. spwa4 ◴[12 Jul 25 10:23 UTC] No.44540925[source]▶
> notoriously complex pricing structure

You mean AWS?

(an AWS bill has about 10 pages of items you get charged for, with only 3 line items explained what they are, and even then, not why you get charged. GCP is better, but not by much (let's call it about 4 pages), and Azure is again better, but also not really (2 pages). AND they're all at least 10x as expensive as colo or dedicated hosting. Yes, 10x. People will deny that, and then you look at charges for data traffic, and conclude that if you use a lot of data traffic, it'll quickly start being more than 10x more expensive. And even cheap dedicated is only cheaper than a box in the corner of your closet for 6 months, maybe a year)

replies(1): >>44541032 #
4. floating-io ◴[12 Jul 25 10:45 UTC] No.44541032{3}[source]▶
Cloud services in general was the intended reference for the quoted words, not a specific provider.