←back to thread

745 points rcchen | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
dalemhurley ◴[] No.44537376[source]
Cursor (and Garry Tan’s X post) has shown us that the VC money is propping up these companies astounding growth, the only way for them to become profitable is to increase the cost per a request, which means they need to innovate like crazy.

The moat is paper thin.

GitHub has open sourced copilot.

The open source community is working hard on their own projects.

No doubt Cursor is moving fast to create amazing innovations, but if the competition only focuses on thin wrappers they are not worth the billion dollar valuations.

I love watching this space as it is moving extremely fast.

replies(6): >>44537680 #>>44537693 #>>44537910 #>>44537998 #>>44538331 #>>44540883 #
woeirua ◴[] No.44537910[source]
There is no moat. If you’re a true believer that strong agents are around the corner, then all of these add on companies will be obsolete in a few years. The first company to strong agents can trivially rebuild Cursor or Windsurf.
replies(1): >>44538414 #
herval ◴[] No.44538414[source]
If you believe AGI is around the corner, doesn’t it mean it’ll replace ALL products?
replies(5): >>44538510 #>>44539451 #>>44539920 #>>44540096 #>>44541572 #
1. charcircuit ◴[] No.44540096{3}[source]
This would only be true if it was cheap to run and would return results quickly. If AGI only has compute to serve 1 customer per hour then their is an upper bound of market share it can take from other products.