(bettersoftwareconference.com)

117 points leoncaet | 1 comments | 11 Jul 25 21:50 UTC | HN request time: 0.212s | source

Show context

zx8080 ◴[12 Jul 25 01:43 UTC] No.44538591[source]▶

For a non-engineer (business) person the case "engineering quality vs move fast break things" sounds more like "slow & expensive VS fast". The choice is obvious.

replies(4): >>44538993 #>>44539214 #>>44539260 #>>44539463 #

userbinator ◴[12 Jul 25 05:07 UTC] No.44539463[source]▶

>>44538591 #

"How can you not have enough time to do it right, but enough time to do it twice?"

replies(2): >>44539963 #>>44540435 #

1. rewgs ◴[12 Jul 25 07:04 UTC] No.44539963[source]▶

>>44539463 #

What a fantastic way of responding to/framing this.

↑

A software conference that advocates for quality